The Taming of the Shrew
The
Taming of the Shrew is a comedy
by William Shakespeare,
believed to have been written between 1590 and 1592.
The
play begins with a framing device,
often referred to as the induction,[a] in which a mischievous nobleman tricks a drunken tinker named Christopher
Sly into believing he is actually a
nobleman himself. The nobleman then has the play performed for Sly's diversion.
The
main plot depicts the courtship
of Petruchio and Katherina,
the headstrong, obdurate shrew.
Initially, Katherina is an unwilling participant in the relationship; however,
Petruchio "tames" her with various psychological torments, such as
keeping her from eating and drinking, until she becomes a desirable, compliant,
and obedient bride. The subplot
features a competition between the suitors of Katherina's younger sister, Bianca, who is seen as the "ideal" woman. The question
of whether the play is misogynistic
has become the subject of considerable controversy, particularly among modern
scholars, audiences, and readers.
The
Taming of the Shrew has been adapted numerous times for
stage, screen, opera, ballet, and musical theatre; perhaps the most famous adaptations
being Cole Porter's
Kiss Me, Kate; McLintock!, a 1963 American western and comedy film, starring John
Wayne and Maureen
O'Hara and the 1967 film of the play, starring Elizabeth
Taylor and Richard
Burton. The 1999 high school comedy film 10 Things I Hate About You is also loosely based on the play.
Characters
- Katherina (Kate) Minola – the "shrew" of the title
- Bianca Minola – sister of Katherina; the ingénue
- Baptista Minola – father of Katherina and Bianca
- Petruchio – suitor of Katherina
- Gremio – elderly suitor of Bianca
- Lucentio – suitor of Bianca
- Hortensio – suitor of Bianca and friend to Petruchio
- Grumio – Petruchio's manservant
- Tranio – Lucentio's manservant
- Biondello – servant of Lucentio
- Vincentio – father of Lucentio
- Widow – wooed by Hortensio
- Pedant – pretends to be Vincentio
- Haberdasher
- Tailor
- Curtis – servant of Petruchio
- Nathaniel – servant of Petruchio
- Joseph – servant of Petruchio
- Peter – servant of Petruchio
- Nicholas – servant of Petruchio
- Philip – servant of Petruchio
- Officer
Characters
appearing in the Induction:
- Christopher Sly – a drunken tinker
- Hostess of an alehouse
- Lord – plays a prank on Sly
- Bartholomew – Lord's page boy
- Lord's Huntsman
- Players
- Servingmen
- Messenger
Synopsis
Prior
to the first act, an induction
frames the play as a "kind of history" played in front of a befuddled
drunkard named Christopher Sly
who is tricked into believing that he is a lord. The play is performed in order
to distract Sly from his "wife," who is actually Bartholomew, a
servant, dressed as a woman.
In
the play performed for Sly, the "shrew" is Katherina, the eldest
daughter of Baptista Minola, a lord in Padua. Numerous men, including Tranio, deem Katherina an unworthy
option for marriage because of her notorious assertiveness and willfulness. On
the other hand, men such as Hortensio and Gremio are eager to marry her younger
sister Bianca.
However, Baptista has sworn Bianca is not allowed to marry until Katherina is
wed; this motivates Bianca's suitors to work together to find Katherina a
husband so that they may compete for Bianca. The plot thickens when Lucentio,
who has recently come to Padua to attend university, falls in love with Bianca.
Overhearing Baptista say that he is on the lookout for tutors for his
daughters, Lucentio devises a plan in which he disguises himself as a Latin
tutor named Cambio in order to woo Bianca behind Baptista's back and meanwhile
has his servant Tranio pretend to be him.
In
the meantime, Petruchio,
accompanied by his servant Grumio, arrives in Padua from Verona. He explains to Hortensio, an old friend of his, that since
his father's death he has set out to enjoy life and wed. Hearing this,
Hortensio recruits Petruchio as a suitor for Katherina. He also has Petruchio
present himself to Baptista disguised as a music tutor named Litio. Thus,
Lucentio and Hortensio attempt to woo Bianca while pretending to be the tutors
Cambio and Litio.
To
counter Katherina's shrewish nature, Petruchio pretends that any harsh things
she says or does are actually kind and gentle. Katherina agrees to marry
Petruchio after seeing that he is the only man willing to counter her quick
remarks; however, at the ceremony, Petruchio makes an embarrassing scene when
he strikes the priest and drinks the communion
wine. After the wedding, Petruchio takes
Katherina to his home against her will. Once they are gone, Gremio and Tranio
(disguised as Lucentio) formally bid for Bianca, with Tranio easily outbidding
Gremio. However, in his zeal to win he promises much more than Lucentio
actually possesses. When Baptista determines that once Lucentio's father
confirms the dowry, Bianca and Tranio (i.e. Lucentio) can marry, Tranio
decides that they will need someone to pretend to be Vincentio, Lucentio's
father. Meanwhile, Tranio persuades Hortensio that Bianca is not worthy of his
attentions, thus removing Lucentio's remaining rival.
In
Verona, Petruchio begins the "taming" of his new wife. She is refused
food and clothing because nothing – according to Petruchio – is good enough for
her; he claims that perfectly cooked meat is overcooked, a beautiful dress
doesn't fit right, and a stylish hat is not fashionable. He also disagrees with
everything that she says, forcing her to agree with everything that he says, no
matter how absurd; on their way back to Padua to attend Bianca's wedding, she
agrees with Petruchio that the sun is the moon, and proclaims "if you
please to call it a rush-candle,/Henceforth I vow it shall be so for me"
(4.5.14–15). Along the way, they meet Vincentio, who is also on his way to
Padua, and Katherina agrees with Petruchio when he declares that Vincentio is a
woman and then apologises to Vincentio when Petruchio tells her that he is a
man.
Back
in Padua, Lucentio and Tranio convince a passing pedant to pretend to be
Vincentio and confirm the dowry for Bianca. The man does so, and Baptista is
happy for Bianca to wed Lucentio (still Tranio in disguise). Bianca, aware of
the deception, then secretly elopes with the real Lucentio to get married.
However, when Vincentio reaches Padua, he encounters the pedant, who claims to
be Lucentio's father. Tranio (still disguised as Lucentio) appears, and the
pedant acknowledges him to be his son Lucentio. In all the confusion, the real
Vincentio is set to be arrested, when the real Lucentio appears with his newly
betrothed Bianca, revealing all to a bewildered Baptista and Vincentio.
Lucentio explains everything, and all is forgiven by the two fathers.
Meanwhile,
Hortensio has married a rich widow. In the final scene of the play there are
three newly married couples; Bianca and Lucentio, the widow and Hortensio, and
Katherina and Petruchio. Because of the general opinion that Petruchio is
married to a shrew, a good-natured quarrel breaks out amongst the three men
about whose wife is the most obedient. Petruchio proposes a wager whereby each
will send a servant to call for their wives, and whichever comes most
obediently will have won the wager for her husband. Katherina is the only one
of the three who comes, winning the wager for Petruchio. She then hauls the
other two wives into the room, giving a speech on why wives should always obey
their husbands. The play ends with Baptista, Hortensio and Lucentio marvelling
at how successfully Petruchio has tamed the shrew.
Sources
Although
there is no direct literary source for the induction, the tale of a commoner
being duped into believing he is a lord is one found in many literary
traditions.[1] Such a story is recorded in Arabian Nights where Harun
al-Rashid plays the same trick on a man he
finds sleeping in an alley. Another is found in De Rebus Burgundicis by
the Dutch historian Pontus de Huyter, where Philip,
Duke of Burgundy, after attending his sister's
wedding in Portugal, finds a drunken "artisan" whom he entertains
with a "pleasant Comedie." Arabian Nights was not translated
into English until the mid 18th century, although Shakespeare may have known it
by word of mouth. He could also have known the Duke of Burgundy story as,
although De Rebus wasn't translated into French until 1600, and into
English until 1607, there is evidence the story existed in English in a jest
book (now lost) by Richard
Edwardes, written in 1570.[2][3]
Regarding
the Petruchio/Katherina story, there are a variety of possible influences, but
no one specific source. The basic elements of the narrative are present in tale
44 of the fourteenth-century Spanish book Libro de los ejemplos del conde
Lucanor y de Patronio by Don Juan Manuel, which tells of a young man who marries a "very strong
and fiery woman." The text had been translated into English by the
sixteenth century, but there is no evidence that Shakespeare drew on it.[4][5] The story of a headstrong woman tamed by a man was well
known, and found in numerous traditions. For example, according to The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey
Chaucer, Noah's wife was such a woman ('"Hastow nought herd,"
quod Nicholas, "also/The sorwe of Noë with his felaschippe/That he had or
he gat his wyf to schipe"'; The Miller's Tale, l. 352–354), and it was common for her to be depicted in
this manner in mystery plays.[6][7] Historically, another such woman was Xanthippe, Socrates'
wife,[8] who is mentioned by Petruchio himself (1.2.70). Such
characters also occur throughout medieval literature,
in popular farces both before and during Shakespeare's lifetime, and in folklore.[6][9]
In
1890, Alfred Tolman conjectured a possible literary source for the wager scene
may have been William Caxton's
1484 translation of Geoffroy IV de la Tour Landry's Livre pour
l'enseignement de ses filles du Chevalier de La Tour Landry (1372). Written for his daughters as a guide on how to
behave appropriately, de la Tour Landry includes "a treatise on the
domestic education of women" which features an anecdote in which three
merchants make a wager as to which of their wives will prove the most obedient
when called upon to jump into a basin of water. The episode sees the first two
wives refuse to obey (as in the play), it ends at a banquet (as does the play)
and it features a speech regarding the "correct" way for a husband to
discipline his wife.[b][10] In 1959, John W. Shroeder conjectured that Chevalier de
La Tour Landry's depiction of the Queen
Vastis story may also have been an
influence on Shakespeare.[11]
In
1964, Richard Hosley suggested the main source for the play may have been the
anonymous ballad "A merry jeste of a shrewde and curst Wyfe, lapped in
Morrelles Skin, for her good behauyour".[12] The ballad tells the story of a marriage in which the
husband must tame his headstrong wife. Like Shrew, the story features a
family with two sisters, the younger of whom is seen as mild and desirable.
However, in "Merry Jest", the older sister is obdurate not because it
is simply her nature, but because she has been raised by her shrewish mother to
seek mastery over men. Ultimately, the couple return to the family house, where
the now tamed woman lectures her sister on the merits of being an obedient
wife. The taming in this version is much more physical than in Shakespeare; the
shrew is beaten with birch rods
until she bleeds, and is then wrapped in the salted flesh of a plough
horse (the Morrelle of the title).[c][13] "Merry Jest" was not unknown to earlier editors
of the play, and had been dismissed as a source by A.R. Frey, W.C. Hazlitt,
R. Warwick Bond and Frederick
S. Boas.[14] Modern editors also express doubt as to Hosley's argument.[14][15]
In
1966, Jan Harold Brunvand
argued that the main source for the play was not literary, but the oral
folktale tradition. He argued the Petruchio/Katherina story represents an
example of Type 901 ('Shrew-taming Complex') in the Aarne–Thompson
classification system. Brunvand discovered 383 oral
examples of Type 901 spread over thirty European countries, but he could find
only 35 literary examples, leading him to conclude "Shakespeare's taming
plot, which has not been traced successfully in its entirety to any known
printed version, must have come ultimately from oral tradition."[16][17] Most contemporary critics accept Brunvand's findings.[18][19][20][21]
A
source for Shakespeare's sub-plot was first identified by Alfred Tolman in 1890
as Ludovico Ariosto's
I Suppositi, which was published in 1551. George
Gascoigne's English prose translation Supposes was performed in 1566 and
printed in 1573.[22] In I Suppositi, Erostrato (the equivalent of
Lucentio) falls in love with Polynesta (Bianca), daughter of Damon (Baptista).
Erostrato disguises himself as Dulipo (Tranio), a servant, whilst the real
Dulipo pretends to be Erostrato. Having done this, Erostrato is hired as a
tutor for Polynesta. Meanwhile, Dulipo pretends to formally woo Polynesta so as
to frustrate the wooing of the aged Cleander (Gremio). Dulipo outbids Cleander,
but he promises far more than he can deliver, so he and Erostrato dupe a
travelling gentleman from Siena
into pretending to be Erostrato's father, Philogano (Vincentio). However, when
Polynesta is found to be pregnant, Damon has Dulipo imprisoned (the real father
is Erostrato). Soon thereafter, the real Philogano arrives, and all comes to a
head. Erostrato reveals himself, and begs clemency for Dulipo. Damon realises
that Polynesta is truly in love with Erostrato, and so forgives the subterfuge.
Having been released from jail, Dulipo then discovers he is Cleander's son.[23] An additional minor source is Mostellaria by Plautus,
from which Shakespeare probably took the names of Tranio and Grumio.[24]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Taming_of_the_Shrew
No comments:
Post a Comment